cassette/liq force

LakeErie · Pop Shuvit Joined: 30 Sep 2003 Posts: 224 City: sandtown

I got a few questions about Liquid Force decks and Cassette

1. When will the Cassette 2004 be available? They arent on buywake

2. How are the LF concaves? Light? Heavy?

3. Are all the 2004 Cassettes blems? I've heard they were really messed up.

wakesk8r9610 · Backside 180 Joined: 23 Sep 2003 Posts: 1267

ask parky about the lf stuff hes like a master on it.

The Pavement 3.6 · Backside 180 Joined: 23 Jan 2004 Posts: 572 City: Eustis

the cassette 2004s are availible go to a board shop or if you want them online go to wakeside.com or boarders-paradise.com. They arent blems theyre fine.

Parky · Guest

LakeErie, hey man... the new LF concaves are very light compared to other concaves... the tech 42 is heaver than the regular concaves becuase its made to be sliden alot so its alittle more heavy detuy.... If your looking for a cheap, light skate go with the 41 or the 40 or 43... Im going to ride the 40 when i get some $ its got a really nice shape Twisted Evil

minus_gravity · Pop Shuvit Joined: 17 Mar 2004 Posts: 205 City: Dalton

The Pavement 3.6, I got my board and shoes from board-paradise.com. They are a good company to deal with, orders came before they said they were going to and good customer service.

I tried lookin at the new cassettes on the site but it only came up as a blank page...I wander if they are just doin work on the site.

Paul · Posted: Apr 04, 2004 4:59 pm Post subject:

Joey White · Pop Shuvit Joined: 15 Sep 2003 Posts: 172 City: Phoenix

actually your all wrong the new tech 42's are really light they are a lot thinner than the other decks and i dont know about the sliding thing parky, thats not true i'm not trying to put you down you just heard wrong information. but yeah i would go with a new tech 42 its such a sick board, it seriously has like the perfect lightness that makes kick flipping it easier and its not too light that you cant feel it when you ride it like the foam boards. and with the other decks they are all good too just i like the tech becuase it is a-symetrical.

Parky · Guest

Paul, I didn't say they where the lighest I just said there very light compared to others

Vance Collins · Guest

I think lighter is worse. Why would you want the board to fly away like a leaf everytime you try something?

Parky · Guest

vance, well not that light.... Laughing

wakesk8r9610 · Backside 180 Joined: 23 Sep 2003 Posts: 1267

i prefer a little lighter boards thats why i might like the hypes better than the cassette well actually i have a lf but same thing.

Catalyst · Backside 180 Joined: 16 Nov 2003 Posts: 736 City: Kelowna

im 5,9 150lb, what board would size would any fo you suggest form cassette or liquidforce?

nick · Posted: Apr 05, 2004 6:07 am Post subject:

ollieshuvitz · Posted: Apr 05, 2004 12:35 pm Post subject:

Parky · Guest

are u riding a LF now Chris41,

wakesk8ordie · Posted: Apr 05, 2004 6:43 pm Post subject:

I have a 2004 LF Concave 43 and I totally dig it. But unfortunately I am going to have to point out that it is noticeably much heavier than the 2003 Cassette concave decks. I am not really sure why this occurs, they look identicle. Though it is heavier the ride doesn't seem compromised in any way. I just picked up the LF deck for the foam.

foammesh · Posted: Apr 05, 2004 6:58 pm Post subject:

I'm on the tech 42" right now. I love the way the board rides and the weight doesn't seem bad either. I put an extra coat of paint to make it a little heavier, but it still isn't as heavy as Reeds board was when I picked his up. My friend broke his in 2 days but it looked like a different pressing(much thinner profile than mine) and could have been a factory second because he got it from one of LFs pros. There were a few people who rode it the two days and we only hit rails on it the second day. I have had mine for a week or two and I think that it is starting to delam already(starting to see shifting between a couple plys and a litle seperation). What else are you going to ride, seems like all the boards you would like to ride don't really exist in a production capacity.

nick · Posted: Apr 05, 2004 7:11 pm Post subject:

its already starting to fall apart? damn

Joey White · Pop Shuvit Joined: 15 Sep 2003 Posts: 172 City: Phoenix

foam mesh are you which board are you saying fell apart

foammesh · Posted: Apr 06, 2004 6:05 am Post subject:

I think it was a factory second LF tech 42", the tail snaped off in 2 days. The production one I bought at performance doesn't seem to be fairing much better, delaming after 2 weeks. I even tried to stay off rails for a week to see if it would snap, but now it has been on em a bunch.