| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
dP
Faceplant
Joined: 01 Jan 2010
Posts: 31
City: Tampa
|
 Posted: May 28, 2010 5:12 pm Post subject: Opinions please!! |
 |
|
Hey yall
First off, thanks for all the continued help on that Greenwala contest...i hope to know by tomorrow If I won!
I got inspired by a similar photo in the Saab dealership when I was waiting for my Mom's car to get serviced. I wanted to recreate it so I snapped a picture of it on my iPhone.
I finally got around to doing my version so check this shizzle out and let me know what yall think
|
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
165.43 KB |
| Viewed: |
2714 Time(s) |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
RC
Backside 180
Joined: 11 Jul 2006
Posts: 1033
|
| Posted: May 28, 2010 5:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I saw this if Fb too. Your photography skills are ballin' bro.
_________________
When it rains, it pours. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fastgreens
Kickflip
Joined: 29 Dec 2007
Posts: 3563
City: baytown
|
| Posted: May 28, 2010 6:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
_________________
north jones |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
burn
Backside 180
Joined: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 1539
City: armpit of tx
|
| Posted: May 28, 2010 7:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| fastgreens wrote: | |
_________________
Peace through firepower!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
-=AlexXx=-
Pillage & Plunder
Joined: 09 Aug 2004
Posts: 17488
City: yes
|
| Posted: May 28, 2010 7:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
born for mom, that killed me ahhaha
great shot man.
hope you win 2morrow!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
scott a
"a" is for angel
Joined: 17 Feb 2004
Posts: 4126
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dP
Faceplant
Joined: 01 Jan 2010
Posts: 31
City: Tampa
|
| Posted: May 29, 2010 4:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| scott a wrote: | dP, Do you have a link to the photo that you were trying to replicate?
Any particular reason why you have the exposure compensation cranked up so high? |
http://www.flickr.com/photos/95279432@N00/274153263/
thats the photo but without the add copy on it.`
Pardon the low res on the final edit. It was too big of a file and WS.com needs to jack up their accepted file sizes!
|
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
146.37 KB |
| Viewed: |
2559 Time(s) |
|
| Description: |
| RAW image from the camera |
|
| Filesize: |
220.01 KB |
| Viewed: |
2559 Time(s) |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dP
Faceplant
Joined: 01 Jan 2010
Posts: 31
City: Tampa
|
| Posted: May 29, 2010 4:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I forgot to answer your question though. It's not exposure compensation. I did a lot of dodging and burning as well as some levels adjustments using masking. This was to help things stand out more and create some of the lighting effects from the original. Had I had my tripod and more time without rain, I was going to a composite HDR with multiple different lighting set-ups but I was rather presed for time. i plan on doing it the propper way soon.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
bromfutter
Backside 180
Joined: 02 Jun 2007
Posts: 1973
City: Casselberry
|
| Posted: May 30, 2010 7:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
You should blend in your headlight triangles a little more like the original and add more light. Set up that tripod and start shooting, I'm in for the HDR.
_________________
HOTDOGS! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
EJazzle
faceplant
Joined: 17 Oct 2007
Posts: 4776
City: Tequesta/orlando
|
| Posted: May 30, 2010 8:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
dP, exposure comp is in your camera. it was set at +4.7. God knows why 
It looks pretty good other than your dodge/burn job behind the car, it looks like you just need to spend a little more time on it.
EDIT: just saw the final one, I would do a little less harsh dodging on the headlights. and i would try to make the beam look like it was coming out of the actual headlights. I think you should burn a little more toward the rear of the car. I would reshoot this in a street, using either 100% ambient or 100% flash. but not a mix
_________________
 TEAM FUN!!!!!!
http://www.ejpeterson.com/
Alex saw it before YOU. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dP
Faceplant
Joined: 01 Jan 2010
Posts: 31
City: Tampa
|
| Posted: May 30, 2010 11:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
| EJazzle wrote: | dP, exposure comp is in your camera. it was set at +4.7. God knows why
It looks pretty good other than your dodge/burn job behind the car, it looks like you just need to spend a little more time on it.
EDIT: just saw the final one, I would do a little less harsh dodging on the headlights. and i would try to make the beam look like it was coming out of the actual headlights. I think you should burn a little more toward the rear of the car. I would reshoot this in a street, using either 100% ambient or 100% flash. but not a mix |
I had no Idea it was set that high. I guess you saw that in flickr stats. I appreciate the pointers. I definitely plan on re-shooting it properly whenever I have the time. I'd ultimately like to do it on an actual runway which I could probably pull off. I'm not happy with the lights at all But that's because when I started the edit, I had my history off on PS and by the time I realized the headlights were blown out too far past what I wanted them to be, there was no way to go back without starting completely over. Being that it was shot during the day, not at night, makes the lack of more lighting acceptable in my opinion. there is no way I could have shot this in one exposure with two lights at night. As for exposure comp, its being neutralized right now lol
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Stats
Favorites
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
